It’s beyond amazing that a cancer treatment derived from WWI mustard gas can poison whole areas and kill troops or disable them before they could charge would be in existence from the end of WWII until now. It’s called chemotherapy or chemo. And like its ancestral combat killer chemical, it kills everything in sight, not just cancer cells.
Research here and in Australia have confirmed the increased survival from chemotherapy at just above 2 percent on average, using the medical system’s own standard of five years cancer free as cured.
And that short survival period is a living hell for most chemo patients who experience the side effects of weakness, loss of appetite and hair, chronic nausea, extreme mental fog, and other debilitating side effects.
In short, the proposed extended life is one that can make some want to call it quits and die instead. But not many die who call it quits early enough to avoid irreparable harm from the toxic drugs used in chemotherapy.
Studies from Within the System Demonstrate the Fatal Folly of Chemotherapy
Dr. Hardin B. Jones, a former professor of medical physics and physiology at the University of California, Berkeley, had studied the lifespans of cancer patients for over 25 years. He had determined that cancer patients who refused all conventional treatments and did nothing lived over four times longer than their counterparts who succumbed to conventional treatments.
Dr. Jones’ report was given in 1961. Since then there have been other reports from MD s have surfaced without being covered by the mainstream media (MSM).
In the late 1970s, Dr. Maurice Fox, a biologist from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, discovered these shockers and published his findings with JAMA (Journal of the American Medical Association) in 1979 regarding breast cancer treatments. The main shocker is JAMA published this!
1. Radical mastectomy was no better than simple lump removal.
2. Breast cancer was diagnosed twice as frequently in 1975 as in 1935. The death rate was also double, showing no progress had been made.
3. Those who refused medical procedures had a lower mortality rate than those who submitted.
4. Early detection meant accelerated treatment and early death.
The Lancet in 1980 published another breast cancer study, “Failure of Chemotherapy to Prolong Survival in a Group of Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer” and concluded:
Overall survival of patients with primary breast cancer has not improved in the past 10 years, despite increasing use of multiple-drug chemotherapy for treatment of metastasis. Furthermore, there has been no improvement in survival from first metastasis, and survival may even have been shortened in some patients given chemotherapy.
Don’t tell them about pursuing natural cures if you are diagnosed, and don’t assert anything about a second opinion. Just say no. For starters on the journey to real cancer healing, consult the best alternative cancer cure database I know of – the Cancer Tutor.
